US12039568B2View granted patent ↗

Granted United States Patent · US12039568B2 · Assignee of record — Emelem Pty Ltd

Independent Claim 19

Computer-readable medium / executable software instructions

Independent Claim 19 protects a non-transitory computer readable medium carrying instructions executable by one or more processors to perform the recited steps. This review environment examines publicly documented software instructions, SDK components, execution locations and integration behaviour against those limitations.

Granted — United StatesView granted claim ↗Download PDF claim chart ↓

Granted claim preamble · verbatim

19. A non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions stored therein executable by one or more processors to perform the steps of:

Claim 19 approaches the protected architecture from the software-execution perspective. The analysis therefore focuses on publicly disclosed software instructions, SDK components, executable functions, device-side processing, APIs, event handlers, data storage and integration instructions that implement relevant functionality. Public sources accessed 26 August 2026.

Statutory perspectives

Analysis across the three independent claims

  1. Claim 1Analysis of the Granted System ArchitectureAnalysis of the claimed system architecture and corresponding publicly disclosed Woosmap functionality.
  2. Claim 10Analysis and Attribution of Recited Method StepsAnalysis and attribution of the recited method steps against publicly disclosed Woosmap operations.
  3. Claim 19Analysis of Executable Software Instructions and Processing EnvironmentsAnalysis of executable software instructions, processing environments and corresponding Woosmap software functionality.

Granted Claim 19

Analysis of Executable Software Instructions and Processing Environments

  1. 01Granted Claim 19 — computer-readable medium
  2. 02Stored instructions
  3. 03Executed by one or more processors
  4. 04Access previously collected user data
  5. 05Match notification for relevance
  6. 06Process location condition
  7. 07Process retailer targeting condition
  8. 08Process temporal condition
  9. 09Conditionally enable communication
  10. 10Deliver relevant notification

The issue is not whether Woosmap offers comparable commercial functionality. The analysis considers whether Woosmap publicly documents executable software components and instructions implementing technically corresponding operations.

Standard analysis format — applied to every Claim 19 element

  1. 01 — Granted claim language
  2. 02 — Software requirement
  3. 03 — Woosmap public software evidence
  4. 04 — Execution location
  5. 05 — Public source
  6. 06 — Technical correspondence
  7. 07 — Open question and correspondence

Granted claim architecture

Three independent claims

Claim 1

Analysis of the Granted System Architecture

Analysis of the claimed system architecture and corresponding publicly disclosed Woosmap functionality.

View system mapping →

Claim 10

Analysis and Attribution of Recited Method Steps

Analysis and attribution of the recited method steps against publicly disclosed Woosmap operations.

View method mapping →

Claim 19

Analysis of Executable Software Instructions and Processing Environments

Analysis of executable software instructions, processing environments and corresponding Woosmap software functionality.

Currently viewing

The three independent claims provide different statutory perspectives on the protected architecture: the system itself, the computer-implemented method, and the executable software instructions. They are separate statutory categories directed to a single architecture, and are analysed as such throughout this review.

Next · 19A — Stored Instructions →